Only council candidate to score straight-a pluses
Warkworth from 4000 to 20 000 by 2040. That would be a five-fold increase in less than half the 50 years it took the region to treble to today’s population, of about 1.5 million.
With this planned growth-rate of more than three times the regional average, Warkworth is essentially going to become a new town. While the Auckland Council had assumed that Warkworth’s growth spurt wouldn’t kick in until post the motorway completion, urban growth there is manifesting its inconvenient tendency to get ahead of its planners. This means that the three fundamental questions about how the town will develop have now become urgent:
- Will the character of the existing town survive?
- What will the character of the new town be?
- To what extent will the new and old be complementary, and connected?
The truly urgent need is for the Warkworth community to help shape how the new town is to develop, or leave it to the developers and one-size-fits-all Auckland Unitary Plan rules.
Structure plans are the mechanism that potentially allows communities to shape their development. Such plans, as passionate Warkworth-based planner Burnette Macnicol explained to the town’s business community on Wednesday evening, can be highly detailed or broad-brushstroke. The trap with becoming too detailed, she said, is that a structure plan can take forever to be agreed upon. And time is not on the side of those who have hopes that the new town can be other than same-old-same-old, car-centric and unwalkable.
A structure plan, by itself, is merely a guiding document and has no teeth. To give it teeth, however, a variation to the Auckland Unitary Plan will have to be made to change the rules and zonings of the land already designated for Warkworth’s growth. Developers will then have the choice of meeting those new requirements, and readily receiving planning approval, or bucking them and taking their chances with non-complying applications. The more strongly the Warkworth community engages in the structure plan process, the less wriggle room developers will be left with for projects that disrespect the town’s collective vision for its future.
At Burnette Macnicol’s urging, Auckland Council is hastening commencement of the structure plan process, which wasn’t due to get underway until 2018. Burnette has also urged that the opportunity be taken with an existing Rodney Local Board funded project, aimed at eliciting priorities for Warkworth projects, to also seek the community’s vision for its new town, quadruple the size of the existing one. Part of the project involves a stall at the Kōwhai Festival, on Sunday 9 October, focussing on aspirations for the essence of Warkworth, the Mahurangi River, between Hills Street and the Wilson Cement Works. Thanks to Burnette, this will now also elicit aspirations for the new Warkworth.
Meantime, there’s an election underway—arguably the most important one ever for the future of Warkworth. One candidate, of course, has made her campaign about the future of northeastern Rodney from the get-go, with her fresh, all-to-appealing billboards extolling residents to ‘Vote for the future.’ Small wonder then that Tessa Berger has just aced Generation Zero’s Auckland election scorecards:
As Warkworth goes from 4000 to 20 000 in 24 years, we need to ensure that the qualities that are attracting this growth aren’t sacrificed to it. As your elected representative I will help ensure we achieve a liveable low-carbon Auckland.
This straight-a-plus result is entirely typical of the Mahurangi born-and-bred 22-year-old who, as a student of Florida Gulf Coast University, achieved American President’s List scholar. Meanwhile, whether voters will score an A+ for understanding that, if they strongly support a particular candidate—thanks to first-past-the-post—they should vote for one not three local board members, won’t be known until Saturday week.
BERGER, Tessa for local board member
Ordered by urgency of deployment
- Year-7–15 voting as curtain-raiser
- Universal year-7–15 voting in schools—extended Kids Voting
- Election Day enrol-and-vote
- Concurrent elections, which will quickly recoup the costs of 1–3, and pay for 4–11
- Lifetime licence to vote
- Pre-enfranchisement voting
- Pre-enfranchisement enrolment
- Lowering the age of enfranchisement—currently some turn 21 before being allowed to vote
- Fixed, holidayised, Mondayised, and festivalised Election Day
- Online voting
- Anytime voting*
*If not strictly evidence-based, then at least, strongly evidence-suggested.