There is nothing put at risk, bar the possible dashing of preconceptions.
Such is the beauty of models: They allow scenarios to be explored virtually, at very little cost—once the software has been written, the model can be run again and again with the only consideration being the time spent by the end user.
The model’s purpose might be to test how green an energy policy is, or if it even keeps the lights from going out. The
United Kingdom boasts a beauty, and Aotearoa badly needs an equivalent. Or it can be to explore what combination of improvements to town’s water reticulation network would be most cost-effective. There’s a strategic section of water main in Helensville with the editor’s name on it, which considerably increases the likelihood that a blaze at the Kaipara College could be extinguished, dating from his brief career as a council-employed water modeller.
Or the purpose of the model may be to allow voters to see what they might gain or lose from voting, in November, to ditch mixed member proportional.
Dr Geoffrey Pritchard and Dr Mark C Wilson, of the Centre for Mathematical Social Science at the University of Auckland, have built such a model, the
2011 Referendum Simulator:
We aim to allow voters to compare the proposed referendum options in a quantitative way, by allowing them to compute quickly, for a given polling scenario, the party seat distribution in Parliament under each system.
The simulator allows Aotearoa’s present fully proportional system to be compared with the referendum options of first-past-the-post, preferential voting, single transferable vote and supplementary member. Users of the simulator may wish note particularly the first-past-the-post and single transferable voting outcomes, as
current polling has these on 40% and 17% respectively—the only options to reach double digits. Garnering just 3%, Don Brash’s favourite, supplementary member, is dead in the water. However, under that system, and based on the
latest TVNZ Colmar Brunton polling, the simulator indicates that Act would pick up one seat, as opposed to none under any of the other three options.
Staying with that polling result, the simulator graphically displays the grossly distorting effects of non-proportional systems: National 101 to Labour 19 under first-past-the-post, and National 99 to Labour 22 under so-called Preferential Voting. Only under single transferable voting, which unlike
Preferential Voting,
is a fully preferential voting system, does the result start to look proportional. However, with but one seat for the Greens, any proportionality is strictly reserved for the two main parties.
In the words of Pritchard and Wilson that accompany each batch of simulated results:
What would this mean for politics and government? We don’t presume to say, but you may have some ideas.
Unsurprisingly, what the simulator doesn’t do is to model the outcome of a
tuned-up mixed member proportional system. By the simple measure of incorporating preferential voting, the
number of list members needed to acheive strict proportionality could be nearly halved. And by deploying Stephen Todd’s graduated threshold, the
insidious coattails provision could be expunged.
A beautiful model for a world-class electoral system.
1 2 3, tune-up MMP:
Very Near to Being World’s
Best Electoral System
Ranking Not Ticking to
Tame Party Lists
Dispatching Electoral Commission
Review Room Elephants
Overdue Tune-Up will Leave MMP
Better Loved than Understood
Tactics and Polls or
Preference Voting
Mixed Member Means
Rout No Landslide
Supplementary Member in Practice is
Mixed Member Disproportional
Graduatedly and Preferentially
Fixing the Fixed Threshold
Possible Change in Six Years or
Definite Change in Three
Electoral Commission Review and
Mixed Member Misinformation
Green Party Dependant Upon
Proportional and Preferential
Party Vote Green Growth
for a Richer Aotearoa
Fascination with the
Beauty of Models
First-Past-The-Post ‘Win’
Argument for Preferential
National’s Power Sets Scene to
Retain and Change MMP
Prendergast Loss Somehow
Pinned on Preferential
Ultimately Successful
Mäori Roll Model
MMP Could be
Ninety-Nine Not Out
Out of All Proportional
Aussies Eat Their Greens
Voting For and Against and With
First-Past-the-Post
Aotearoa has
MMP Half Right
Cartoon:
Shucks Shirty
Proportional Preferential and
What’s to fix with MMP
Part of a hope-based network restoring and enjoying the Mahurangi
Editor Cimino Cole
Pretty Modelling: The 2050 Pathways Calculator provides six views of the results, including this revealing diagram of energy flows from generation to end use, in Professor Nick Jenkins’ pathway for the United Kingdom. Diagram Department of Energy and Climate Change
Pretty Comprehensive: At the push of a button, the 2011 Referendum Simulator can be populated with the voting percentages of any of the mixed member proportional elections. Interface montage Mahurangi Magazine, from 2011 Referendum Simulator interface, University of Auckland
Not Pretty: Although the 2011 Referendum Simulator interface is decidedly plain, it is the disproportionality of the alternatives to mixed member proportional that is really ugly. The results displayed here are based on the latest TVNZ Colmar Brunton polling, and assume the Mäori Party wins five electorate seats and Act one. Table University of Auckland
